The Heathrow Expansion National Policy Statement Consultation on 3rd Runway

29/08/2026

 If the Government approves this revised National Policy Statement, Heathrow will the carry out its own detailed consultation before submitting a proposal for a third runway to a Public Inquiry. You can view the Government’s draft National Policy Statement on the Department of Transport’s website.

Below is the HACAN East response concentrating on the possible impacts on the area we cover.

Response from HACAN East

 HACAN East gives a voice to residents under the London City and Heathrow flight paths. We cover areas in East, North East and South East London. We are the sister organisation of HACAN, which helped set us up. We now operate independently from HACAN.

In our response will concentrate on the proposals and options as they may affect the geographical areas we cover.

  1. Our Area

Much of our area is overflown by both Heathrow and London City aircraft. The Heathrow aircraft are mainly arrivals. They are at approximate heights of:

· 6,000ft over Walthamstow and Leytonstone

· 5,000ft over Greenwich

· 4,000ft over the Oval.

London City aircraft fly a lot lower, often held down by the Heathrow airspace above.

  1. The Current Situation

A key factor which has worsened the noise climate in recent years was the concentration of London City flight paths. London City concentrated all its flight paths in 2016. No respite was provided. The result has been that fewer people are overflown than previously but, those who are, are much worse off. Complaints jumped almost fivefold within a year.

  1. Our comments on the National Policy Statement Consultation

Respite

We welcome the commitment to respite in the statement. We have a number of suggestions to make it as effective as possible for residents:

· There should be several rotating routes;

· These routes should be as far apart from each other as possible;

· The respite routes should go out to at least 7,000ft;

· Respite from Heathrow planes and London City planes should be coordinated.

Heights

The recent guidance to the CAA and UKADS that noise should only be prioritised up to 5,000 ft is a bitter blow to many of our supporters and does not tally with reality, particularly in light of the recent reports, ANAS and ANNE, which showed that people get annoyed by aircraft noise at lower levels than previously acknowledged. The National Policy Statement gives the Government the opportunity to reverse its guidance to the CAA and UKADS.

 Numbers Impacted

We welcome the clear recognition that noise from Heathrow planes impacts more households than any other airport in Europe. We have three comments:

  • It would be useful to convert that into actual number of people

  • The figures need to be revised in the light of the ANAS Report

  • Figures need to be produced of the number of people impacted by both Heathrow and London City

Night Flights

The requirement of a six and a half break is insufficient.

Timing

Noise measures to assist residents need to become operational from the opening day of any new runway.